PRESS & OTHER MEDIA
Most of these interviews are about open space offices. Knowing how easy it is for journalists to misinterpret what you say in interviews I have always demanded to read the articles for content before publications and mostly they have given a good interpretation of what I have said. At some occasions however the journalist have had an own agenda in communicating that open space offices are dysfunctional, bad environments or even dangerous as work places. After some discussions it has mostly been possible to correct these incorrect quotes.
It is important to state that I do not have a general preference for open space offices or cellular offices or any other design or configuration of office space. My message is always that people need both space for communication/interaction and space for concentration. Cellular offices makes it possible to concentrate but are mostly an obstacle for communication and learning and open space offices give plenty of opportunities for interaction with others and mostly also give great opportunities for creativity and learning, but is less suitable for such activities that need silence, consent ration and maybe isolation. So, my point is that the design of office space always should take its point of departure in the work situation, the preferences of staff and always give opportunities for both interaction and concentration.
It is therefore interesting to see that too many of the headlines to the interviews suggest that I am against open space offices. And, they pretend to quote me to communicate a negative view on open space offices. There are head lines like: "Professor warns against open space offices!" or "Staff get burnt out in open space offices!".
The result of this is that other journals and newpapers quote this and also some BLOGs discuss open space offices taking the fake quotes as facts when discussing open space offices. The problem with this is that the readers get the wrong input in discussions of office design and get the impression that a good office design is simply about open or not open space offices.
Familj och Produktion - vägval inför 2000-talet
/Family and production - choices for the 2000th/
Red. Erik Sundström. Trivsel på jobbet - konkurrensmedel eller nödvändighet. Intervju med Jan Åke Granath sammanställd av Erik Sundström. FRN- Framtidsstudier, 1991. Swedish)
Ingenjörer måste kunna kommunicera teknik
/Engineers must be able to communicate technology/
Article in Magasin Chalmers 3:1998 on the program Communication in Technology (Swedish)
Se behoven på nytt sätt
/To look at our needs in a new way/
Article in Magasin Chalmers No 2, 1999 (Swedish)
Han gjorde om Svenska Mässans korridorer till öppna landskap
/He has converted the offices of the Swedish Fair into open space/
Interview in Mässans Tidning 6:2004 after the redesign of the Swedish Fair (Swedish)
Bygg för förändring
/Build for change!/
From Lokalguiden April 2005
See related topics and documents
Folk går in i väggen i öppna landskap
/Staffs get burnt out in open space offices!/
Interview  in Dagens Industri, Februari 2006 (Swedish).
Öppna landskap passar inte alla
/Open space offices does not suit everybody!/
Interview in Civilingenjören 3:2006 (Swedish)
See related topics and documents
Kontorslandskap passar inte alla
/Bürolandschaft does not fit everybody/
Quote in  Ledarna February 2006 from Dagens Industri (Swedish)
Professor varnar för öppna landskap
/Professor warns about open space offices!/
Interview in Sydsvenska Dagbladet, October 2006 (Swedish)